There's nothing wrong with using multiple Digital Audio Workstations - I think it makes you more versatile and what if a situation came up where you had to use a DAW you had no idea how to work.
#Ableton live 9 lite software
They may actually learn enough though to creatively work around or within these limits rather than purchasing more software or hardware that is possibly not even required. I use Cubase for that kind of stuff (being a multi-DAW user also) and Wavelab for doing sound editing and processing but for a basic recording and sequencing session I wouldn't waste time switching DAWs for a simple task such as recording an input.Īs Stromkraft said, for someone getting a handle on it all (and we both make this assumption based on the users questions and level of detail) learning a single DAW is all one needs until they discover themselves where the limitations are.
Now, if you want to start doing multiple takes, auditioning, chorus layers it's still possible but way more complex to do nicely. Therefore, live can certainly record audio to work with no issues. all directly in live with basic edits without having to leave lives environment and had no issues or limitations. I have recorded vocals, instruments (guitars/keyboards), DJ scratching, sound effects etc. The user isn't asking for a complete multi-track audio recorder and sequencer, just if they can record a microphone. Live does lack a little in this area which is known But you probably need to keep a user's level of skills in perspective vs what they can use to get the job done. There are better solutions for multi-track recording and editing. You may be making assumptions as to what the user wishes to do though and thinking more complicated than it needs.
I'd prefer to invest on Hardware for my Home Studio rather on an Software upgrade.
0 kommentar(er)
